Early routine amniotomy: an unnecessary procedure
Keywords:
Amniotomy, artificial rupture of membrane, routine, labour, processAbstract
Early routine amniotomy, also known as artificial rupture of the amniotic membrane, is one of the procedures used to induce and accelerate labour before cervical dilation reaches four centimeters. Because of its benefits and risks, there are at least two schools of thought about this controversial issue. The purpose of this paper is to argue against early routine amniotomy as an unnecessary procedure that can have drastic and unintended outcomes associated with the labour process, the fetus, and the mother. This commentary paper articulates that early routine amniotomy is a questionable procedure because its risks outweigh its benefits. Therefore, routine early amniotomy should be discouraged among obstetrical procedures.
References
Cooney LG, Bastek JA. The Association between Early Artificial Amniotomy and Chorioamnionitis in Nulliparous Induction of Labor. Int Sch Res Not [Internet]. 2014;2014:1–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27379338 %5Cnhttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articler ender.fcgi?artid=PMC4897382
Malarvizhi V, Swati R, Santosh j B, Abraham A, Antonisamy B. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of amniotomy on the duration of spontaneous labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2017;138(2):152–7. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ijgo.12203
Smyth R, Markham C, T D. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2013;4(6):1–87. Available from: www.cochranelibrary.com
WHO. Recommendations for Augmentation of Labour Summary Recommendations Grouped by Process of Care. 2015 Apr;(April):1–4. Available f r o m : http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/174001/
/WHO_RHR_15.05_eng.pdf?ua=1
Cohain JS. The less studied effects of Amniotomy.
J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2013;26(17):1687–90. Available from:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/14
2013.798286
Vadivelu M, Rathore S, Benjamin SJ, Abraham A, Belavendra A, Mathews JE. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of amniotomy on the duration of spontaneous labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2017;138(2):152–7. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ijgo.12203
Lavender T, Hofmeyr GJ, Neilson JP, Kingdon C, Ml G. Europe PMC Funders Group Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3(February 2012):1–22.
Smyth R, Markham C, Dowswell T. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4(6):1–87.
WHO. Recommendations for Augmentation of Labour. Highlights and Key Messages from World
Health Organization's 2014 Global
Recommendations. 2015;1–4. Available from:
www.mcsprogram.org
Neilson JP, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S.
O b s t r u c t e d l a b o u r. B r M e d B u l l .
;67(October):191–204.
Gross.M M, Fromke C, Hecher.Hartmut. The timing of amniotomy, oxytocin and neuraxial analgesia and its association with labour duration and mode of birth. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2014;289(1):41–8. Available from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2 Fs00404-013-2916-7.pdf
Ruamsap K, Panichkul P. The effect of early versus late amniotomy on the course of labor. J Med Assoc Thail [Internet]. 2017;100(2):125–32.
A v a i l a b l e f r o m :
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=
- s 2 . 0 -
&partnerID=40&md5=802188320
bbae4c74f94b7cf
Ghafarzadeh M, Moeininasab S, Namdari M. Effect of early amniotomy on dystocia risk and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2015;292(2):321–5. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3645-x
Ylä-Outinen, A., Heinonen, P.K., Tuimala R. Predisposing and risk factors of umbilical cord prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet].
;64(7):567–70. Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L16113558%5Cnhttp://sfx.library.uu.nl/utrechtsid=EMBASE&issn=00016349&id=doi:&atitle=Predisposing
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Research Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Research Journal of Health Sciences journal is a peer reviewed, Open Access journal. The Journal subscribed to terms and conditions of Open Access publication. Articles are distributed under the terms of Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/4.0). All articles are made freely accessible for everyone to read, download, copy and distribute as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.