Management of type B2 and B3 post-operative proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures, Oghara experience.

Authors

  • R. E. T. Enemudo
  • E. O. Edomwonyi
  • D. O. Odatuwa-Omagbemi
  • A. T. Obumse
  • M. M. Awa

Keywords:

Periprosthetic femoral fracture, Long stem hip prosthesis, Vancouver classification, osteolysis

Abstract

Objective: To report the outcome of treatment of Types B2 and B3 Post- operative Periprosthetic proximal femoral fracture (PPFF) in four patients treated in Delta State University Teaching Hospital, Oghara, Delta State, using Vancouver classification of Duncan and Masri.

Methodology: A retrospective study of four cases managed in this hospital. Information retrieved from case notes were sex, age, duration of prosthesis, treatment given, complications and outcome of treatment.

 

Result: A total of 4 patients were reviewed in the study, 2 males and 2 females with a M: F of 1: 1. Duration of the implant before treatment was 5-12 years (mean of 8.3years). Age range was 60-83years (mean of 67.5 years). Two patients had Type B2 and two had Type B3. Average intraoperative blood loss was 1 litre. Duration of surgery was 3-4 hours. Duration of hospital stay was between 3 weeks and 5 months. The complications seen were primary haemorrhage, wound infection, hip dislocation and pulmonary embolism. The outcome was good for 3 patients and fair in 1, using Harris Hip Score.

Conclusion: Vancouver classification of Duncan and Masri is effective in the treatment of PPFF.

References

Marsland D, Mears S.C. A Review of

Periprosthetic femoral Fractures Associated with Total Hip Arthroplasty. Geriatric Orthop. Surg. Rehabil. 2012;3(3):107-120

Berry DJ. Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(3 suppl 1):107–111

Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures: classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty.

;20(7):857–865

Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H. Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(6):1215–1222

Adolphson P, Jonsson U, Kalen R. Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1987;106(6):353–357

Duncan CP, Masri BA. Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect. 1995;

:293–304

Duncan CP, Haddad FS. The Unified

Classification system (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J., 2014;96-B:713–716.

Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12):1576–1579

Franklin J, Malchau H. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury.

;38(6):655–660

Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J. Locking plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures of femur: a report on 12 patients. Injury. 2007;38(6):725–733

Delasotta LA, Orozco F, Miller AG, Post Z, Ong A. Distal femoral fracture during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2015 Aug;23(2):202–204.

Serocki JH, Chandler RW, Dorr LD. Treatment of fractures about hip prostheses with compression plating. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7(2):129–135

Corten K, Vanrykel F, Bellemans J, Frederix PR, Simon JP, Broos PL. An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(11):1424–1430

Ricci WM, Bolhofner BR, Loftus T, Cox C,

Mitchell S, Borrelli J., Jr Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(10):2240–2245

Klein GR, Parvizi J, Rapuri V et al. Proximal Femoral Replacement for the treatment of Periprosthetic fracture. J Bone and Joint Surg. Am. 2005;87(8):1777-1781

Tsiridis E, Narvani AA, Haddad FS, Timperley JA, Gie GA. Impaction femoral allografting and cemented revision for periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br.

;86(8):1124–1132

Chandler HP, Tigges RG. The role of allografts in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Instr Course Lect. 1998; 47:257–264

Gallagher JC, Sai AJ. Vitamin D insufficiency, deficiency, and bone health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(6):2630–2633

Zuurmond RG, van Wijhe W, van Raay JJ, Bulstra SK. High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 71 cases. Injury. 2010;41(6):629–633

Lindahl H, Oden A, Garellick G, Malchau H. The excess mortality due to periprosthetic femur fracture. A study from the Swedish national hip a r t h r o p l a s t y r e g i s t e r . B o n e .

;40(5):1294–1298

Drew JM, Griffin WL, Odum SM, et al.

Survivorship after periprosthetic femur fracture: factors affecting outcome. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016; 31:1283–1288.

Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, et al. Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the f e m u r. J B o n e J o i n t S u r g A m .

;89(12):2658–62.

Toogood PA, Vail TP. Periprosthetic Fractures. A Common Problem with a Disproportionately High Impact on Healthcare Resources. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(10):1688–1691.

Enemudo RET, Odatuwa-Omagbemi DO,

Edomwonyi EO, Okeke MO. Management of

Neglected Posterior Hip Dislocation Using a Two-Stage Procedure. Nigerian Research Journal of Clinical Sciences. 2015;5(2):119125

Downloads

Published

2023-10-09

How to Cite

Enemudo, R. E. T., Edomwonyi, E. O., Odatuwa-Omagbemi, D. O., Obumse, A. T., & Awa, M. M. (2023). Management of type B2 and B3 post-operative proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures, Oghara experience. Research Journal of Health Sciences, 9(1), 52–60. Retrieved from https://rjhs.org/index.php/home/article/view/269