Knowledge, acceptability and utilization of epidural analgesia in antenatal clinic attendees at UNIOSUN Teaching Hospital (UTH), Osogbo, Osun State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4314/rejhs.v11i1.8Keywords:
Labour pain, Epidural analgesia, Awareness, Knowledge, Acceptability, UtilizationAbstract
Background/Objective: Labour pain is perceived as the most harrowing and agonizing event of a woman's life. Efforts at reducing the pain and making the event less stressful have predated modern obstetric practice. Epidural analgesia has provided effective pain relief in labour for over three decades. Delivery with epidural analgesia is routine for willing parturients in the developing world, however ignorance, cost as well as lack of qualified personnel has made this to be out of reach of the average Nigerian mother. The aim of this study was to assess level of awareness, acceptability, previous utilization and willingness to utilize epidural analgesia in labour following health education.
Subjects/Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the antenatal clinic of UTH, Osogbo. Health education on events of labour and methods of analgesia available was provided to all antenatal clinic attendees between September 2021and March 2022, following which a semi–structured purpose designed, and self- administered questionnaire was administered to 415 of these women who consented to participate in this study.
Results: The mean age of the respondents was 32.57± 4.42 years and mean parity of 1.73± 0.96. 70.8% reported that labour pain was severe. 41.7% were aware of epidural analgesia before the health talk. 3.6% of our subjects had utilized epidural in their last confinement. However, only 47.7% expressed a wish to utilize epidural analgesia in labour.
Conclusion: Awareness of epidural analgesia in study population was passable at 40% however willingness to utilize it was less than average despite health talk and reassurance by their attending obstetric team.
References
Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth, The John Bonica Lecture. Pain. 1984;19:321–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
Akadri AA, Odelola OI. Labour pain perception: experiences of Nigerian mothers. Pan Afr Med J. 2018; 30: 288.
Khwepeya M, Lee GT, Chen S, Kuo S. Childbirth fear and related factors among pregnant and postpartum women in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy &Childbirth 2018; 18: 391
Update on Global Prevalence of Severe Fear of Childbirth in Low-risk Pregnant Women: A systematic Review and Meta-analysis. International J Women's Health Reprod Sci. 2021; 10 (10): 1-5.
Alleemudder DI, Kuponiyi Y, Kuponiyi C, Mc Glennan A, Fountain S, Kasivisvanathan R. Analgesia for labour: evidence–based insight for the obstetricians. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2015; 17:147-55.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists-Obstetric Analgesia and Anaesthesia Practice Bulletin Number 209, 2019.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4. PMID: 29781504; PMCID: PMC6494646.
Anozie OB, Lawani LO, Mamah JE, Ezike CO, Ezeonu OP, Eze JN et al. Epidural Analgesia for Management of labour pain: Determinants and Deterrents Among Obstetricians in Nigeria. Intern J women's Health & Reprod Sci.2018; 6(4):410-14.
Okojie NQ, Isah EC. Perception of Epidural Analgesia for Labour among Pregnant Women in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital Setting. J of the west Afr coll of surg. 2014; 4(4): 142-162.
Olaleye O, Dada SO, Alabi GO. Awareness and Utilization of Obstetric Epidural Analgesia in Labour Among pregnant Women in Wesley Guild Hospital Ilesha, Nigeria. Intern Quat Community Health Educ.2020; 0(0): 1-8.
Ezeonu PO, Anozie OB, Anozie RO. Perceptions and Practice of epidural analgesia among women attending antenatal clinic in FETHA. Intern J women's Health 2017; 9: 905-11.
Shammi K, Hong Y, Sourabh K, Liqin C, Dongyan Q. Women's awareness and Attitudes towards Labour Analgesia Influencing practice between Developed and Developing Countries. Advances in Reproductive Sciences 2016; 4(2).
Lim Y, Sia ATH. Dispelling the myths of epidural pain relief in Childbirth. Singapore Med J 2006; 47(12): 1096.
Daniel WW, editor. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences. [Google Scholar] [Ref list]
Al Sulmi ES, Al Yousef MM, Almuslim JA, Al Muslim RA, Amailo ZA, Alabbad FA. Awareness, Perceptions, and Desirability of Epidural Analgesia Among Pregnant Women in King Fahad University Hospital, Al Khobar. Cureus. 2021 Dec 3;13(12):e20146. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20146. PMID: 34900501; PMCID: PMC8648163.
Ozdemir S, Chen T, Tan CW, Wong WHM, Tan HS, Finkelstein EA, Sng BL. Parturients' Stated Preferences for Labor Analgesia: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Apr 8; 16:983-994. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S353324. PMID: 35422614; PMCID: PMC9005131.
Cheng WJ, Hung KC, Ho CH, Yu CH, Chen YC, Wu MP, Chu CC, Chang YJ. Satisfaction in parturients receiving epidural analgesia after prenatal shared decision-making intervention: a prospective, before-and-after cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03085-6. PMID: 32689958; PMCID: PMC7370438.
Nguyen LD, Nguyen AD, Farber MK, Phan CT, Khuat LT, Nguyen HT, Dang TM, Doan HTN. Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Request for Labor Epidural Analgesia in a Tertiary Obstetric Hospital in Vietnam. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 30; 2021:8843390. doi: 10.1155/2021/8843390. PMID: 33604386; PMCID: PMC7868158.
Leighton BL, Halpern SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labour, maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systemic review. Am J obstet gynecol. 2002; 186 (5 supple structure): S69
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Research Journal of Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Research Journal of Health Sciences journal is a peer reviewed, Open Access journal. The Journal subscribed to terms and conditions of Open Access publication. Articles are distributed under the terms of Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-nd/4.0). All articles are made freely accessible for everyone to read, download, copy and distribute as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.